San Antonio Politics

Posted by on Sep 6, 2016 in Politics

San Antonio
Image by szeke

What do you understand about the politics of San Antonio? I am able to tell you this Texas capital is quite successful. Many folks understand the Republicans are powerful in Texas. That is been true for quite a long time. San Antonio is an extremely desirable city. That is why the city gets lots of immigrants annually. It’s among the most developed cities in the entire state. Why this is so we’ll see.

Every American city deals with corruption, particularly the important cities. Well, can the same be said for San Antonio? Not actually. This city has an extremely low level of corruption. By looking at George Bush do not judge Texas. Facts are facts. And they say that San Antonio is among the least corrupted cities in the nation. That is not totally false. That is why everything is here. The law is upheld to the fullest.

San Antonio does not have a high crime rate. This additionally says things that are wonderful about the politics of San Antonio. A lot of people think this is a typical hillbilly city. Well, this is false. San Antonio has many strict laws and that is why the crime rate is low in this city. The courts do their job and they uphold the law as much as they’re able to.

You likely understand that most American cities don’t have an excellent public transportation system. You must go with the automobile. Well, San Antonio is not same. It’s a highly developed public transportation system. It’s working well and it is used by individuals daily. Many individuals feel good about it. The city does not compel them to use the auto all the time. Everything is nicely ordered and everything works.

The market of this city has began growing. There was some stagnation while the downturn was not low.

Learn More

American Democracy Past to Present

Posted by on Jul 14, 2016 in Politics

american democracy
Image by AK Rockefeller

Democracy is democratic in that it only lets that whatever will happen, happens. And for Americans in the 21st Century, it means that money has to hide behind the ideals of anyone else or LBJ . All the commendable prattle was eviscerated from the Constitution, and now that all pretenses about human rights are stripped from the Bill of Rights, capitalism and cash have appeared to take preeminence in the democratic procedure. Democracy is held by cash quickly by the throat. LBJ and Kennedy were only two odd men out. And idealism did not work out nicely for Carter.

Now that the Corporatocracy is outside in plain sight, it is extremely clear what democracy means in America. Barring some really unusual set of conditions, the nominee with the most support of corporate interests and lobbyists will win. And if the cash race is close, then the success of backstabbing that is idealistic decides the winner.

There actually is no longer a significant difference between Republicans and Democrats. The Republicans change to the right, and as the Democrats switch to the right, it’s clear the real winners in American politics are the conglomerate of private health insurance firms, and AIPAC, Mobil, Shell, BP, Merck. Cash does, actually, make the world go around.

And President Obama is good with this. Is Nancy Pelosi, and Mitch McConnell, and John Boehner et al. The actual fight being ran in the name of ‘democracy’ is about who controls the purse strings.


Learn More

The Future of Television Advertising Is Addressable

Posted by on Jun 14, 2016 in American Culture, Politics


The upcoming American presidential election has brought into sharp focus the ability of technology to bring messages to large, targeted groups of people. Imagine a way to directly target political ads to various households by using data derived from their own purchases and other activities. Now stop imagining, because this technique, known as “addressable” television advertising, is already here.

The New World of Addressable TV Advertising

The technology that makes addressable television advertising possible has actually been around for some time, but only recently have marketing firms began seriously exploring the implications of data-driven TV commercials. Prompted by the success of targeted Internet advertising, these marketing firms have now leapfrogged into the world of television.

Addressable television advertising is fueled by many of the same technologies and data collection methods that make targeted Internet advertising possible. Marketers can research information such as income, family makeup, vehicle leases or even contracts for cellular service to design the perfect blend of advertising for a particular household. By reaching out to a chosen group, return on advertising investment is much higher and ad budgets can be stretched much farther.

Furthermore, the feedback gained from this targeted advertising can be extremely useful in planning future ad campaigns. Just as with Internet advertising, marketers can analyze viewer reactions to certain types of ads, making it easy to adjust the advertising stream based on the response of the recipient.

Politics, Playtime and Pizza

The implications of addressable television advertising are staggering. On a national scale, these data-driven marketing tactics could feasibly sway entire elections if “swing” voters are targeted by various campaign information designed to appeal to the importance they place on various issues. Of course, this also means that the candidate with the most money has even more of an extreme advantage in any election than is the case currently. Instead of expensive marketing studies, candidates can analyze voter trends with relative ease using data shared every time an individual or family watches TV, then purchase time based on their findings. Major pay-TV providers Dish Network and DirecTV have partnered to provide valuable viewer information that political marketing teams need to inform their advertising investment decisions. The PR teams behind candidates Sanders, Clinton, and Trump have used this strategy to determine what shows target audiences are watching and tailor their messages accordingly. DTV’s new All-included pricing is introducing more viewers to the potential of Internet-enabled TV sets and devices, growing the pool of personalized media-related data even further. 

Of course, the implications for addressable television marketing go beyond the idea of politics. With this form of marketing, advertisers can now reach anyone who watches television instead of the relatively small percentage that may be using the Internet. It may be a great way to reach children who are currently protected by parents from too much Internet activity. Every child that watches television could be a target of addressable marketing during their favorite programming. Additionally, everything from kayaks to pizza advertisements can be pushed toward teens and others when their shows are airing.

The “Creepy” Data Factor?

Companies such as Eyeview are already touting the benefits to advertisers of targeted television marketing. However, many experts are concerned about the availability of so much data to any marketer who wishes to use it.

In some ways, the use of big data to target families for particular advertising seems a bit creepy, like a chapter of 1984. On the other hand, targeted marketing makes economic sense, especially considering how it could lower the cost of goods and services for families of all income brackets. It could also be used to help families learn about services and benefits about which they might not otherwise know.

In the end, it will remain up to consumers to guide the marketing industry in determining how successful this type of advertising becomes. With positive feedback from viewers, it is likely that addressable television advertising will continue to grow as a viable form of marketing.

Learn More

Our National Debt Is Growing, And That’s Worrying

Posted by on May 12, 2016 in Politics


Image by Ted Van Pelt

While authorities were covered by an earlier post in this series in general, politics in America are worth a more in depth look. The fact difference in American authorities, as much as if not more than every other nation, is about cash. In the U.S., cash wins elections. Voters across most demographics regularly cast their vote in favor of the very identifiable name they see, particularly in regards to regional or local elections. This, obviously, means a nominee must get her or his name out there as much as possible to be able to achieve success. But this comes at a price, and someone has to foot the bill.

Nominees, to their voters, make an image in which they may be running on a program. There are just two fundamental messages they use. The foremost would be to set their own “beliefs”, as the voters are led to believe, in a positive light. As an example, the November 2010 General Election’s marquee statement from conservative nominees is “financial responsibility”. Understanding that lots of Americans are worried about a growing national debt, they use that fear as a tool of motivation. The other message nominees use brings down their rivals in what’s called an “attack ad”. Frequently, they will emphasize transgression or a particular error that their competition has perpetrated on a private level. Their system of voter motivation in this instance is discouragement and rage.

None of the above is actually news to the typical American voter. What’s, however, is the muddling of the “pure” program a nominee runs on when cash becomes involved. Public relations campaigns that nominees run and the advertising are incredibly pricey, and they’re often paid for by private interest groups called PACs, or Political Action Committees. This financing procedure leads to complications that need the average voter to delve much deeper than a nominee’s publicized program.

When one reads news stories about a so called “conservative” politician trying to add pork barrel earmarks into laws that work in favor of particular businesses, it’s not because they’re going back on their beliefs. Basically, this is a standard procedure of repayment in American politics. As an example, say a politician gets elected on an “environmental” or “eco-friendly” program. Afterward, she or he votes yes on a bill to provide tax cuts to energy firms that use fossil fuels. Generally, you can deduce that one or more of these firms helped to finance that politician’s campaign. Their behaviour as a congress member as well as the difference between their stated beliefs is not always malicious or ill-intentioned; it is simply the only means that a politician can get elected in modern American politics.

The lesson to take away from private effort financing isn’t to mistrust or despise all politicians. Generally, they’re truly curious in forwarding targets they believe in. Since they’re indebted to the private interests that financed their campaign however, their hands are tied. This is a payment system which will probably remain the same in the future, and ought to be strongly paid attention to by responsible voters.

The Usa will take more than 630 sportsmen to the Beijing Games and plans to win 40 gold medals (archery, baseball, beach volleyball, basketball, kayak, cycling, equestrian, swimming, sports, boxing, gymnastics, sailing, shooting, football , softball, rowing, tennis, triathlon, taekwondo, indoor volleyball, wrestling).

Qatar is to begin complete preparations for the Beijing Olympics in August and will prioritise sport, weightlifting, equestrian, shooting…

Montegrin national men’s water polo team qualified for the 2008 Summer Olympic Games. Under the direction of Petar Porobic, who’s among the best trainers on the planet, Montenegro won the European Olympic Qualification Tournament in Bratislava (Slovak Republic/former Czechoslovakia). Montenegro will compete for the very first time in the Olympics. In China, Petar Parobic will feel the weight of anticipation from his birthplace. “I ‘ve just one reservation -whether we possess the patience to wait. Time. Individuals anticipate and results are expected by sport men immediately. No one realizes it is difficult for fast results. You need to have a span to arrange and gets results”, he said.

Learn More

The Tea Party Movement Has Had a Positive Impact on American Politics

Posted by on May 5, 2016 in Politics

tea party
Image by John Beagle


In the last few decades there’s been no political movement comparable to the Tea Parties. The Tea Party Movement is exceptional because it’s totally want and grassroots to alter American politics from the bottom up. The Democratic leaders and the mainstream media misunderstand and underestimate the movement. They’ve labeled it a movement of extreme right-wing fanatics that are upset at having a black President, or do not need to pay taxes, or “cling to firearms and faith”. They’re incorrect. Actually, the Tea Party Movement is a mainstream “awakening” that’s been long overdue and will not whither and die within a couple years as some call.

The Tea Party groups are a loose and decentralized coalition of libertarians, conservatives, disenchanted independents and moderate democrats. Tea Partiers aren’t a targeted group of ideologues but a varied set of standard groups that are dismay at the course of the state. It started with the Stimulation Package that was wasteful and was amplified by taxes developed into cap’n’trade and health care reform. Tea Partiers are upset at the corruption and total lack of transparency in the Democratic Congress and the Obama administration.

The largest problems for Tea Partiers are excessive government spending, the market and the growth of government power in the last two years. Some tea party groups have differing precedence but these concerns are shared by almost all tea party groups or may have additional problems of concern. Tea Partiers also share three core ideals: (1) small government/individual liberty; (2) financial duty; and (3) free markets. They are alarmed at the dramatic increase in national power and firmly support restricting the power of the federal government. Tea Partiers are the generational theft occurring, and outraged at the huge budget deficits, the increase of the national debt. Lastly, they’re powerful proponents of economic freedom and believe firmly that the Democratic Congress and President Obama are dismantling are free market economy in favor of a centralized, socialist economy.

Another significant component of the movement is their disposition toward partisan politics. Tea Partiers have expressed their frustration and displeasure with Democrats in addition to the Republicans. Generally speaking, Tea Partiers are anti-organization and need sweeping changes inside their representatives. They’re highly suspect of the sway of the national party leaders in local elections and career politicians. Consequently, they’ve rejected the organization or conventional nominees in quite a few primaries, choosing activist or more separate nominees.

The Tea Party Movement isn’t all-white, all-conservative, violent or racist. These accusations are thrown out without any evidence. Surveys have found that supporters of the Tea Party Movement are mostly mainstream when it comes to demographics. About 49% of Tea Party supporters are Republican while a surprising 43% are independents. They come from every socio-economic class, age group, and ethnic group. Just 79% of Tea Party supporters are white which is comparable to the percent of whites in the general public. Despite the despicable accusations of elitist and Democrats media characters, Tea Partiers are representative of the American people in nearly every manner.

Another baseless accusation is that Tea Partiers are violent gun-touting maniacs. The movement doesn’t advocate the violent overthrow of the authorities. At virtually every demonstration and protest, Tea Partiers have innumerable signs reading “recall in November”. Tea Partiers need change through elections not gunfire. Like any other movement, there are people that are violent and unhinged, but the focus on this incredibly little sect of the media shows their lack of ethics and liberal bias. In fact, the Tea Party Movement is one of the most peaceful large scale political demonstrations in recent memory.

The aim of the Tea Party Movement would be to shift the Republican Party from within. The Tea Parties have flexed their muscle in several primary elections. In Illinois, the son of former Speaker Dennis Hastert was conquered by a lesser-known Tea Party nominee named Randy Hultgren. In Kentucky Senate primaries and the Nevada the Republican establishment firmly supported Tray Grayson and Sue Lowden. Nevertheless, their close connections with the party leaders led to their ultimate defeat and feeling to lesser known nominees Rand Paul and Sharron Angle.

The Tea Party Movement has also led to the removal of incumbent Republicans including Sen. Arlen Specter, who was induced to change parties. Other conquered incumbents contain Rep. Bob Inglis of South Carolina and Sen. Bob Bennett of Utah. The primaries of the previous few months certainly show the Tea Party Movement has had several achievements getting their own nominees on the ballot in November and is quite powerful within the Republican Party. To put it differently, the party is successfully shifting.

Restore America’s Heritage and the Tea Party Movement have a lot in common when it comes to political orientation. The Tea Party firmly supports three of RAL’s five principles (small government, fiscal responsibility, free markets). The Tea Party has made an extremely strong attempt to become more active and better educated in the conventional political process. RAL wants to do the same, raising capital to support efforts, supplying supporters with advice, and assessing nominees using an unique and particular standards. Both need to support candidates with real world experience and also are critical of career politicians.

The Tea Party Movement is a favorable development in American politics and RAL firmly supports their actions. If the Tea Party Movement is successful in the Midterm elections, it’s going to show that it’s the individuals that hold the power and that career politicians can be held responsible. It’d also show that a powerful anti-establishment and anti-government movement can show itself serenely through legitimate political action, not bullying or violence and a huge grassroots effort. It will likewise strike a blow to cynics who believe that Washington changes. RAL expects the Tea Party Movement will triumph in its attempts to bring new direction to the White House in 2012 and to Congress in 2010.

Learn More

Do Sites Dynamically Transform the Modern American Political Culture

Posted by on Apr 24, 2016 in Politics

Image by DavidWees


Lately web logs, or blogs, have exploded in popularity and have come to inhabit an increasingly significant position in American politics. Given the difference in resources and organization against other celebrities, their sway presents a puzzle. How can a set of decentralized, nonprofit, contrarian and discordant sites exercise any influence over political and policy outputs? We’ve got new expectations about both the right to express an opinion and accessibility to information upon which to base that view as the Internet strategies its adolescents. Sites have started playing an essential part in raising people’s expectations So, sites have shown sway; the capacity to change events. Blogging is placed in the answers of mainstream media as well as the context of participatory journalism and political parties to the brand new technology are expressions of its own sway that was appearing. From what signs exemplifies, sites have managed to influence the news program of today.

The Italian Renaissance gave Western civilization several critical transformations. None, for the goals of this post, issues more than view. Boccaccio’s Decameron, printed in 1353, is regarded as one of the first works of literature to propose that a point of view is critical to comprehension. Gutenberg’s printing press brought that no one could have expected in the time. The Web is the main medium since the printing press nowadays. It is, in the most essential manner, transformative and subsumes all that’s come. When anyone can be a writer, in the greatest sense and for a world-wide audience, many want to become one. In fact, no better surroundings exists now for individuals to exercise these among a number of other rights, than among the most effective mediums and the Internet to exercise these rights are weblogs.

According to some critics, most weblogs won’t ever try to reach a people, even if they’re in theory reachable by all Net users. While the user base is going to be peer to peer, not writer to people the vast bulk of weblogs will most likely be for private use. Other critics, within their effort to assess the accelerating speed of the weblog tendency, support that from what it looks so far, it’s not improbable that most weblogs will likely be short lived, and wind up left as most dialogs are left. Additionally it’s likely that a few popular sites will have enormous user base as well as the vast bulk will probably be invisible most of the time, a routine that reminds some of the “old” and “conventional” mass media. Since interface and the applications are exceptionally adaptable, as well as the uses of an upgraded, good looking page are never-ending, weblogs will be generally used in closed systems – business networks and private – as much as the open waters of the Web.

In regard to political coverage and news stories, bloggers have broken or magnified important news stories and sites themselves bring fire for partisan politics, poor journalistic practices, and duplicity. However, the problem remains that sites continue to be within their infancy, regardless of the tide of press they’ve received during the past couple of years. They offer a decent, but far from perfect, entry point into the news space, better at beginning dialogues than functioning a current-events and offering comments -index function.

Learn More