Great politics, policies, and practices have been recorded as the three finest elements by which public event goals could be attained. This declaration means that for a public policy to realize its goals, it needs to be feasible. Nevertheless, a politically feasible policy is just workable if it does alter the immediate policy or the status quo and it should be implementable both theoretically and in practice to attain its goals (Brown & Scales, 2012). America and her NATO allies must so ensure the junction of three rules of good policies, good practices, and great politics in carrying out its operations and mandate in Afghanistan.
With these principles in position, the U.S would have long triumphed in its intervention in Afghanistan with relation to the establishment of a working government that supplies essential services to its citizens. Several reasons are mentioned to spell out the issues as well as the challenges the U.S faces as it attempts to create a secure and working authorities in Afghanistan. First, scholars and many journalists mention uncontrolled corruption in Afghanistan as a hindrance to the establishment of a working government in the state. Also, the U.S and her friends have consistently neglected to take care of the Afghans that drive out as well as kill fellow Afghans which are committed to rebuilding their nation. Corrupt Afghans and these offenders and terror groups gain from the numerous chances and tremendous inflow of cash getting into the state.
The U.S. had an opportunity and the resources to help in rebuilding Afghanistan immediately after the invasion but let the opportunity slip away. Nevertheless, there’s still time and chances for the U.S to reconstruct the nation and empower its hardworking and patriotic citizens. The U.S, in addition to the neighborhood Afghans must consequently be more than prepared and willing to expose and get rid of the non-patriotic groups and people that seek to benefit in the local, regional, and national level in the expense of hardworking Afghans (Brown & Scales, 2012). This paper investigates the very best potential policy direction that America should embrace to realize most, if not all of its targets in Afghanistan.
The Greatest Policy on Afghanistan
To realize its goals in Afghanistan such as the restoration of national security, the entrenching and spread of democracy, human rights, the balance of power in the area as well as the protection of the American troops’ and citizens’ interests, the U.S foreign policy on the country as well as the war therein should be directed by certain core principles. Principal among these principles is the requirement to stress the value of pursuing policies that ensure U.S citizens are safe. Moreover, there’s demand for the U.S to stop the amount of war and turn to a span of peace that will restore its standing in world leaders. To destroy and demoralize the leaders of terror groups in Afghanistan and other nearby terror nucleuses such as Pakistan, there’s a demand for extraordinary measures by politicians, servicemen, and policymakers for the critical second which will give results in Afghanistan to arrive even as the U.S starts to wind down and finally stop the occupation of Afghanistan (Brown & Scales, 2012). Luckily, together with the entry of President Barrack Obama, lots of favorable strategies and policies are invented and executed towards stopping the U.S occupation of Afghanistan. Nevertheless, there’s still room for progress as the Obama administration strives to attain its goals in Afghanistan. The policy therefore supports the majority of the present White House policies on Afghanistan even though other stakeholders have opposed some of Obama’s policies on Afghanistan.
The recommended policy towards Afghanistan must also summarize a national and wide-ranging strategy to counter terrorism, focusing on Taliban, its leaders, there affiliates, and supporters. Strategies to stop the war in Afghanistan in a responsible manner and remove all U.S forces from the state must subsequently be summarized and declared. It should nevertheless be clear the core goal of the recommended policy on Afghanistan must strategize to disrupt, dismantle, and overcome the Taliban and other terror groups and connections in the nation and its own neighbors (Lansford, 2003). In fulfilling this latter aim, the policy need to ensure that an established and globally built coalition of stakeholders participate in supporting the people of Afghanistan against the Taliban and other terrorists. It’s just via these coalitions that economic development and the democratic reforms which are much desired in Afghanistan may be reached. Moreover, the international community should play a fundamental function in ensuring prosperity and peace in the whole Middle East but also in Afghanistan.
It is, in addition, significant the U.S government policy on Afghanistan creates a clear differentiation between terrorism and Islam. In this particular context, the policy must strive to take up a fresh and positive relationship between America as well as the world Muslim community (Lansford, 2003). The other significant feature of the policy the Usa should embrace in Afghanistan is the mobilization of resources to help in offering aid services to the Afghans impacted by the war. In this regard, the U.S will reset and reshape its tainted relationship with Muslims along with with other nations, which have an understanding the U.S just boosts its interests in Afghanistan and not the interests of the Afghans.
Reducing the Amount Of Troops
The decrease in the amount of U.S troops in Afghanistan is the other significant part of the policy the U.S should embrace on Afghanistan as it’d demonstrate the U.S will not mean to reside in the state forever. Actually, raising the amount of U.S forces in Afghanistan would only incite and heighten anti-U.S thoughts around the planet. These anti American opinions would in turn be utilized to recruit more terrorists, suggesting the forces that the U.S and her friends seek to curtail may actually be reinforced if the erroneous policy and strategies are utilized in Afghanistan. However, some adjustments are needed in the U.S troops in Afghanistan. For example, adjustments to should be done so that the U.S soldiers in Afghanistan train Afghani soldiers and police to keep law and order and to ensure their boundaries and individuals (Auken, 2012). In training the Afghani soldiers and cops, achievable and realistic targets ought to be set. As an example, the amount of Afghani forces must be that which the central government can command.
The policy to be used in Afghanistan by the Unites States should thus not be simply intellectually and theoretically coherent but should be really and practically achievable with the aid of the Afghani authorities and those of its neighbors like Pakistan. The top policy must thus be based on effectual and adequate direction to arouse political will and support from the Afghanis and to be popular. In other words, the policy must value that support and the political will of the Afghanis is crucial that you the realization of its goals in Afghanistan than the political will of America and her friends. Support and especially hinged on the Afghani political will is the aim of making the Afghani authorities to take hold of the direction in the country’s. The direction and also the other parts of the nation ‘s people must additionally be transformed and prepared in regard to abilities, schooling, language, culture, history, economic, and literacy to take over government (Auken, 2012).
Despite of the applicability of the above mentioned policy supported by the Obama administration in realizing U.S targets in Afghanistan, resistance to such policies has emerged from different quarters. In late 2011, for instance, several US generals balked at President Obama’s strategies to withdraw soldiers from Afghanistan. Among those opposing the President’s withdrawal policy contain General John Allen and General Stanley McChrystal who was replaced by General Petraeus in 2010 as senior Afghan commander after specific posts in which he made making contemptuous comments regarding President Barrack Obama’s government (Auken, 2012).
Although the U.S has forfeited some chances to reconstruct and stabilize Afghanistan, there’s still room to design and execute a sound and successful policy to help in the realization of these aims. This policy should be economically, socially, and culturally acceptable by the Afghanis. Nevertheless, the well being as well as the interests of U.S soldiers and civilians should be provided for and protected in this policy. The truth is, the Obama administration has covered significant ground in making the Afghani authorities useful and secure. Nevertheless, there’s been some degree of resistance to Obama’s policy of pulling away U.S troops from Afghanistan at a steady speed, more so from some of his generals who say the withdrawal of troops would make hard remove insurgents as well as their sanctuaries, further complicating U.S attempts to protect supply lines ahead the scheduled 2014. !